Director: Gints Zibalodis 
Rated: PG (peril & thematic elements) 
Runtime: 1 hour & 25 minutes 

​Humans can learn something from animals in the silence of their language and their ability to coexist. Sure, animals have distinct sounds, but they can communicate across species and live together in a way that doesn’t require a total understanding of unique languages, making their lives extraordinary. If you’ve ever had a pet, you know that looking into their eyes sends you deep into their soul. It’s beyond explanation.

This reality is captured beautifully in the Oscar-winning animated feature film, “Flow,” directed by Gints Zilbalodis. The Lithuanian film marks the country’s first Oscar win, but it’s groundbreaking for many reasons. There’s no dialogue in the film, with music and the real-life sounds of animals as the only sound backdrop. This could easily make it boring, but the thrilling story combined with the animal’s expressions – which sometimes break from realism – move the one-hour and 25-minute film along at a decent speed. It’s a massive testament to the filmmakers. The film also did not use high-budget animation techniques but a free, open-source software called Blender. Production in total cost $3.7 million. For comparison, the film’s biggest rival for the Oscar win, Universal’s brilliant “The Wild Robot” cost $78 million.

“Flow” centers on Cat – none of the animals have names or defined genders – who is living in what seems to be a post-apocalyptic world where humans are no longer there. Cat lives a pretty normal life given the circumstances, living off the land, running from prey animals (like a local pack of dogs) and curling up in the bed of a home, which could have been their former owners (it’s never defined). We have no idea of any of these creatures we encounter ever existed with humans.

Soon, Cat’s world quickly drowns around them – literally. A flood consumes Cat’s home, and they are left swimming for their life. Cat must find drier land for safety, and they’re not the only one. Cat thankfully is saved by a Whale-like sea monster and a wooden boat manned by a capybara. The duo picks up other creatures along the way, including a klepto lemur, a hyper Golden retriever and a savior Secretary Bird who winds up leaving his flock in solidarity with Cat.

They weave throughout a beautiful, treacherous world in this tiny boat, with plenty of hilarious, true-to-their-nature moments: Cat bouncing back and forth toward a light reflecting off Lemur’s mirror they can’t help but stare into, one of Lemur’s many treasures; Capybara sleeping every moment they can, giving zero cares about their predicament; the Golden retriever playing with Lemur’s treasured glass ball; and Secretary Bird trying to keep the nonsense in check all while steering the boat.

But there are also moments when their survival is tested, from Cat getting separated from the boat when they chase after Secretary Bird to the boat being suspended in a tree, high above a cliff with Capybara trapped inside. There are beautiful moments where the family must come together to help each other, and sometimes others – like the rest of the dog pack stranded at sea, standing on a structure barking to be rescued. Then, of course, there’s the somewhat divinity of Whale, who always seems there to save the creatures in various ways, if they were ever really there.

There are many theories about the meaning behind “Flow,” with director Zilbalodis being clear that he has his own interpretation of his films, which he usually doesn’t comment on to give others room to see it from their own experience. Themes include climate change, what it means to build a community and even our relationship with the divine.

For me, it’s a story of found-family and how, amid impossible situations, there’s hope in working together. In a divisive, chaotic world, we can learn lessons from these creatures who banded together despite their differences and the odds stacked against them.

“Flow” is a captivating film that is so different in a sea of great animated features. It’s ultimately a simple story with so much heart. I loved watching it, as did our cat, Simba, who was enthralled for most of the story, staring up at Cat and the other creatures. Watching our beloved pet watch a film with a similar fascination perfectly encapsulated the film’s universality and portrayal of how a shared experience can connect us, no matter what species we are.   

In an unexpected turn, the most shocking revelation in “Captain America: Brave New World” is not how bottom of the barrel bad the CGI has become, but that “The Incredible Hulk” happened almost 17 years ago and looks 1000 times better.

​As part of a cinematic universe, this feels neither cinematic nor part of a universe I’m interested in visiting. The core issue with ‘Brave New World,’ though is that the new titular Captain America isn't the most interesting character in the movie. Did I watch “The Falcon and the Winter Soldier”? Yes. Do I remember any of what occurred? No. That said, I would have much preferred a government conspiracy thriller that was also a period piece in which Carl Lumbly's Isaiah Bradley was the protagonist on a mission in the thick of the Korean War. I'm not saying Anthony Mackie's Cap doesn't have the charisma to carry the feature, but Bradley is such a richly complex character it feels like so much is being left on the table.

The acting is stilted, the editing even more so, and the soundtrack isn’t cohesive with the tone at all. Harrison Ford is in this movie. Crazy, isn't it? How he adds almost nothing to it. Also, and this might be considered a spoiler, but Bucky's inclusion here that seems to exist solely to shine light on his new status within the U.S. government makes ... absolutely zero fucking sense. Additionally, the casting of Shira Haas is fascinating for many reasons, none of which trend positive. There are so many odd choices in this movie. Adamantium though, eh? Fine, I'll keep watching.

I liked what “Skincare” is going for more than what it accomplishes. It feels like a movie stuck in its first act for too long only to rush its third. If the energy, tone and momentum of the final 20 minutes were maintained more evenly, it might have allowed for more narrative propulsion (if not necessarily depth). I adore Elizabeth Banks and believe her comedic sensibilities are undervalued both here and in Hollywood in general, but music video director Austin Peters at least infuses a slick sense of style into the proceedings; it's just bad luck this released the same year as “The Substance” given it's saying so many of the same things but in a much less brazen and effective fashion.

by Julian Spivey
With the crowning of writer-director Sean Baker’s “Anora” as Best Picture at the 97th annual Academy Awards on Sunday night (March 2), award season has officially come to an end.

Both award season, which seems to take up more and more calendar space, and the Academy Awards, which neared four hours in length, can be a slog to get through, especially in years like this year, when the winners were mostly the same from award show to award show.

There were still some things to be excited about on Oscars night, many of which came from the lovable emcee of the evening, Conan O’Brien, making his debut as Oscars host.  
​
Here were my favorite moments from the 97th annual Academy Awards telecast: 

Sean Baker’s Historic Night
Sean Baker is the kind of filmmaking wunderkind we should be thrilled for, even if he made the movie we wouldn’t have voted for to win ourselves (which is true in my case). He’s a do-it-all and do-it-independently type filmmaker who writes, directs, edits, and co-produces his films – often telling small, real-to-life stories, the type you won’t get from blockbuster Hollywood cinema. This do-it-all process made Baker the winningest person in Oscar history for one year when he won Best Picture, Best Director, Best Film Editing, and Best Original Screenplay on Sunday night. Technically, he tied Walt Disney with four wins in one night, but Disney’s came for four different films (three of which were shorts) and not the same film. Baker’s achievement is cooler.

Kieran Culkin’s Acceptance Speech
The one actor who kept winning everywhere throughout award season who I didn’t tire of was Kieran Culkin, who was honored with just about every Best Supporting Actor award there is for his portrayal of manic free spirit Benji in writer/director Jesse Eisenberg’s “A Real Pain.” The reason why I never tired of Culkin is he brings some of that mania into the real world with his acceptance speeches and his bit about how after winning an Emmy Award last year for his TV role in “Succession” he asked his wife for a third child and then mentioned he’d actually like to have four children. She told him he’d have to win an Oscar for that. Culkin’s acceptance speeches always seem off-the-cuff, but that’s probably just his style and he’s a good enough actor to make it feel that way.

No Other Land
There wasn’t as much political talk in acceptance speeches as one might have predicted going into the night, especially given the current political climate of the United States and the world. But politics would be hard to ignore, particularly in the Best Documentary Feature category, especially with the win going to “No Other Land,” which is such a hot button topic in this country that it still doesn’t have a U.S. distributor (hopefully that’ll change after winning the Oscar). The film, made by a collective of Palestinian and Israeli filmmakers, shows the destruction of the occupied West Bank’s Masafer Yatta region. Palestinian director Basel Adra was the first to accept the award and mentioned how he hoped his daughter would not grow up in a world of “ethnic cleansing.” Then his Israeli co-filmmaker Yuval Abraham pointed out that although “No Other Land” was made in the spirit of cross-cultural love, his country was one of freedom to move wherever and his co-filmmaker’s (Adra) was one of military rule and there was a path forward, but “the foreign policy in this country (U.S.) is helping to block [that path] … There is another way. It’s not too late for life and the living. There is no other way.” It was also nice to see actress Daryl Hannah shout out Ukraine before presenting an award.

The Little Film from Latvia Wins
One of the biggest surprises of award season was the animated film “Flow” from Latvian director Gints Zilbalodis. Featuring no dialogue, “Flow” tells the story of a community of animals – a cat, capybara, secretarybird, ring-tailed lemur and golden retriever – that band together during a flood to help each other survive. It’s a beautiful film that features beautiful animation using the free and open-source software Blender. It was going up against behemoths from DreamWorks Animation and Pixar and came out victorious winning Best Animated Feature. It was the first Oscar win ever for the country of Latvia. The film was also nominated for Best International Feature, a rarity for an animated movie, but fell to Brazil’s “I’m Still Here,” the first ever Oscar-win for Brazil, in that category.

In Memoriam Done Right
One thing I’ve taken issue with for years from many awards shows is messing up the in memoriam section by focusing as much, if not more, on the artist chosen to perform a song during the segment than the deceased artists being remembered instead. The Oscars made the terrific decision this year to not get a superstar performer for the segment and let the audience, both in the theater and at home, focus on the most critical aspect of the segment. Instead, the orchestra in the theater performed Mozart’s “Lacrimosa,” which a friend of mine felt odd (but I didn’t really notice or care), while we paid tribute to legends like Donald Sutherland, James Earl Jones, Maggie Smith and more. The segment began with a lovely in-person tribute to two-time Oscar-winner Gene Hackman, who died earlier in the week, from his friend and multiple-time co-star Morgan Freeman. This is how the in memoriam segment at every award show should be handled.   

Conan O’Brien
Conan O’Brien was my dream choice to host the Academy Awards, and he didn’t disappoint, though I don’t think he was funnier than the man who’s hosted most of the last few years, Jimmy Kimmel. Kimmel has more bite to his humor, which plays better at an award show than O'Brien's wacky, zaniness. However, O’Brien did have many highlights of his hosting stint, not just in his opening monologue, but throughout the evening. I enjoyed that he didn’t let the Karla Sofia Gascon scandal go untouched, joking about how the 400-plus ‘F-words’ in “Anora” were second only to Gascon’s publicist, “you tweeted WHAT?!” I like that he didn’t let President Donald Trump off the hook for his ridiculous meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy with a poke at President Trump after a winning streak by “Anora” was forming, saying: “I guess Americans are excited to see somebody finally stand up to a powerful Russian.” I also immensely enjoyed his jokes at the halfway point of the evening when he said this is the portion of the night where Kendrick Lamar shows up to call Drake a pedophile, and later on about the telecast’s runtime saying, “if you’re still enjoying the show you have something called Stockholm Syndrome.” While O’Brien’s jokes may not have had quite the bite from some hosts in the past, his awareness of the ridiculousness of the evening was a nice touch. The intro based on “The Substance,” Adam Sandler’s cameo and the “Cinemastream” pre-tape were also delightful.